HR Compensation: Market Data, Self-Advocacy, and the Conversations We Put Off

Please feel free to save or share this link to refer back to this offering. For in depth information or for scheduling, please visit the activity site directly as detailed in the activity description.
17 Jun

HR Compensation: Market Data, Self-Advocacy, and the Conversations We Put Off

HR Compensation: Market Data, Self-Advocacy, and the Conversations We Put Off

Wednesday, June 17, 2026 (12:00 AM) to Thursday, December 31, 2026 (11:59 PM)
1 PDCs
Provider: My HR Extension
Course Name: HR Compensation: Market Data, Self-Advocacy, and the Conversations We Put Off

Speaker: Casey Webster & Jill Kane
Program Type: Videoconferences, webcasts, audiocasts, podcasts, eBooks, self-directed E-Learning
Registration URL: https://the-business-side-of-hr-f900f8.circle.so/home-page

Email Details

By the end of this session, participants will be able to: 1. Identify key factors that influence HR compensation, including industry, company size, geography, role scope, decision-making authority, internal leveling, and current market demand. 2. Differentiate between common compensation data sources, including employer-reported surveys, HRIS-connected platforms, job postings, employee-reported salary sites, government data, and staffing agency reports. 3. Explain why market data is a starting point, not a complete compensation case, and how to combine external market data with internal context such as pay range placement, job level, scope, and performance. 4. Evaluate whether a compensation concern is primarily related to base pay, title, internal level, job scope, bonus opportunity, or career path clarity. 5. Translate HR accomplishments from task-based activity into business outcomes tied to revenue, cost savings, risk reduction, operational efficiency, retention, leadership capability, or business performance. 6. Prepare for compensation, title, or career growth conversations using evidence such as scope, impact, authority, performance, internal alignment, and measurable business results. 7. Apply professional language to advocate for pay, title, scope, or career path alignment without leading with emotion, comparison, accusation, or unsupported market data. 8. Develop a clear compensation or career growth ask, including the desired outcome, supporting evidence, next steps, timeline, and appropriate decision-makers.

You're Registered!
Human Resources professionals are often responsible for helping leaders and employees navigate compensation conversations, salary ranges, internal equity, promotions, job levels, market data, and career growth. HR professionals may coach managers on how to communicate pay decisions, support leaders through promotion and adjustment conversations, review salary structures, analyze market data, and help employees understand compensation practices. Yet many HR professionals find it much more difficult to advocate for their own compensation, title, scope, or career path. This session addresses that unique challenge. HR professionals often have access to sensitive compensation information, market data, job postings, salary ranges, and internal decision-making processes. They may see how compensation decisions are made for other employees or functions, while also wondering whether their own role, title, scope, or pay is aligned appropriately. This creates a professional tension: HR is expected to support and explain compensation decisions for others, but may not always have the language, structure, or confidence to raise questions about their own compensation in a clear, factual, and productive way. In this recorded educational webinar, compensation expert Jill Kane joins Casey Webster for a practical conversation about HR compensation trends, market data, role alignment, and self-advocacy. The session explores what has changed in the HR labor market in recent years, including the evolution of HR roles since COVID, increased expectations for HR to operate strategically, growth in specialized HR functions, the rise of HRIS, people analytics, AI-enabled roles, and the continued complexity of HR career paths. Participants will gain insight into why HR titles and pay ranges can vary widely across companies and why it is important to evaluate compensation through the lens of industry, company size, geography, role complexity, decision-making authority, scope, internal level, and business impact. The session also explains how to interpret different sources of compensation data. Participants will learn the difference between employer-reported compensation surveys, HRIS-connected data platforms, job postings, employee-reported salary sites, government data, and staffing agency reports. The discussion emphasizes that market data can be helpful, but it is not a complete compensation case on its own. Market data should be treated as a starting point or signal, not as definitive proof. Participants will learn why compensation conversations are stronger when external market data is combined with internal context such as job family, pay range, level, scope, authority, performance, business results, and role evolution. A central theme of the session is that hard work alone is not a compensation strategy. HR professionals may assume that working harder, taking on more responsibility, supporting leaders, or solving behind-the-scenes problems will automatically result in recognition, promotion, or pay adjustment. This session challenges that assumption and encourages participants to translate their HR work into business value. Participants will explore how to reframe HR accomplishments from task-based activity into measurable business outcomes, such as revenue protection, cost savings, risk reduction, operational efficiency, improved retention, stronger leadership capability, faster hiring, better execution, or reduced business disruption. For example, rather than describing an accomplishment only as “hired 25 employees” or “implemented a training program,” participants are encouraged to connect those outcomes to the business need they supported. Hiring may have helped the organization meet a product launch date, maintain production capacity, support growth, or reduce operational strain. Training may have improved manager effectiveness, reduced ramp time, increased consistency, reduced compliance risk, or improved employee performance. This shift helps HR professionals communicate their value in a language that executives and decision-makers are more likely to understand and act on. The session also provides practical guidance on how to prepare for conversations about pay, title, scope, level, bonus opportunity, or career path. Participants will learn how to clarify the issue they are trying to solve before initiating a conversation. In some cases, the concern may be pay alignment. In others, it may be a title mismatch, role scope expansion, unclear promotion criteria, level misalignment, bonus target inconsistency, or lack of career path clarity. By identifying the actual issue, HR professionals can make a more focused and productive request. Participants will also learn how to approach these conversations with curiosity and clarity rather than accusation, comparison, or emotional frustration. The session emphasizes the importance of asking for clarity, understanding the internal compensation structure, and presenting evidence in a professional and business-focused way. Participants will be encouraged to avoid leading with individual comparisons or confidential information and instead focus on their own scope, responsibilities, authority, impact, market context, and business contribution. The webinar includes examples of practical language HR professionals can use to start these conversations. Sample questions include asking whether the organization can review how the role is currently aligned, how the role’s scope has changed, where the role sits within the pay range, what criteria would support movement toward midpoint, what business impact would support the next level, or what steps are needed to align title, scope, and compensation more accurately. Participants will also learn the importance of leaving the conversation with clear next steps, timelines, and decision ownership. This activity is designed to help HR professionals strengthen both their compensation knowledge and their self-advocacy skills. It supports HR professionals in becoming more confident, prepared, and business-focused when discussing their own pay, title, scope, and career growth. It also reinforces the broader HR competency of using data, business language, and evidence-based communication to influence decisions. This session is appropriate for HR professionals at all levels, including HR coordinators, HR generalists, HR specialists, HR business partners, HR managers, HR directors, people operations professionals, total rewards professionals, and HR leaders. It is especially relevant for HR professionals who want to better understand HR compensation trends, evaluate their own role alignment, prepare for compensation or career growth conversations, and advocate for themselves in a professional, evidence-based way. By participating in this activity, learners will gain a clearer understanding of how HR compensation is influenced, how to interpret market data appropriately, how to connect HR work to business results, and how to prepare for productive conversations about pay, title, scope, and career growth without leading with emotion.